UniswapvsFluid
The original AMM versus a newer design: Uniswap's unmatched asset coverage across ~40 chains against Fluid's capital-efficient smart-collateral pools on Ethereum, Arbitrum and Base.
At a glance
Full comparison
Every figure is a dated snapshot from public sources (Oct 10, 2026); fields without a verifiable source show n/a. “Best” marks the stronger value in a row — higher volume or liquidity, lower fees, longer track record. Max leverage is shown as information, not a positive.
| Exchange | $UNI ★★★★★★★★★★78/100Solid | $FLUID ★★★★★★★★★★75/100Solid |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Spot DEX (AMM) | Spot DEX (AMM) |
| Chains | EthereumBaseArbitrumPolygon+1 | EthereumArbitrumBase |
| 24h volume | $1.82BBest | $127.6M |
| 7d volume | $15.83BBest | $775.7M |
| Total value lockedLiquidity depth | $3.95BBest | $916.6M |
| Token price | $7.59 | $2.08 |
| 24h change | 3.21% | 1.72% |
| Market cap | $4.75B | $173.8M |
| Maker feeNegative = rebate | 0% | 0% |
| Taker feeLower is cheaper | 0.3% | 0.05%Best |
| Max leverageHigher = riskier | — | — |
| Trading pairs | 9,800Best | 120 |
| LaunchedLonger track record | 2018Best | 2024 |
| Security scoredexwatch estimate | 90/100 | n/a |
| Audits | Trail of BitsABDKConsenSys | Not available |
Affiliate links are marked and may earn dexwatch a commission at no extra cost to you. Educational content only — not financial advice.
Want a different matchup?
Open this in the live tool and add up to four DEXes.
The honest take
We have not published an editorial pros-and-cons review for Fluid yet; the figures above come from public sources.