DEX comparison · updated Oct 10, 2026

HyperliquidvsTxFlow

The original against its closest imitator: Hyperliquid’s audited bridge, public validator set and deep books versus TxFlow’s invite-only L1 with 226 markets, an anonymous team and an unaudited core.

At a glance

Higher 24h volume
Hyperliquid
$2.52B
Lower taker fee
Roughly even
0.045% vs 0.045%
Deeper liquidity (TVL)
Roughly even
$7.11B vs n/a
Longer track record
Hyperliquid
since 2024
dexwatch score
Hyperliquid
91/100

Full comparison

Every figure is a dated snapshot from public sources (Oct 10, 2026); fields without a verifiable source show n/a. “Best” marks the stronger value in a row — higher volume or liquidity, lower fees, longer track record. Max leverage is shown as information, not a positive.

Exchange
★★★★★★★★★★91/100Excellent
$—
★★★★★★★★★★58/100Caution
TypePerp DEXPerp + Spot (app-chain)
ChainsHyperliquid L1TxFlow L1
24h volume$2.52BBest$131.7M
7d volume$34.33Bn/a
Total value lockedLiquidity depth$7.11Bn/a
Open interest$11.96BBest$29.5M
Token price$84.23No token
24h change0.98%—
Market cap$18.74Bn/a
Maker feeNegative = rebate0.015%0.015%
Taker feeLower is cheaper0.045%0.045%
Max leverageHigher = riskier40×75×
Trading pairs178227Best
LaunchedLonger track record2024Best2026
Security scoredexwatch estimate88/100n/a
AuditsZellic (bridge)OpenZeppelin (bridge only)
ℹ
TxFlow · status

Mainnet since 28 March 2026, still invitation-only via access codes. Points Season 1 was announced on 28 September but its rules are unpublished; the Volume Ascent fee-credit campaign runs until 14 October 2026. DefiLlama halves TxFlow's self-reported two-sided open interest; we use that one-sided figure.

Affiliate links are marked and may earn dexwatch a commission at no extra cost to you. Educational content only — not financial advice.

Want a different matchup?

Open this in the live tool and add up to four DEXes.

Customise comparison →

The honest take

Hyperliquid
✓Deepest liquidity and tightest spreads of any perp DEX, by a wide margin
✓Order-book matching feels just like a centralized exchange; spot, lending and outcome markets now share the same account
✓Fee revenue is used to buy back the HYPE token; base fees drop with volume and staking
✕Runs on its own L1 — assets must be bridged in (USDC via Arbitrum)
✕Only the bridge has a published audit; the core matching engine does not. Built for active traders, not beginners
TxFlow
✓Very broad market list (about 226 perps including US equities, FX, metals and pre-IPO names) with 75× on majors
✓Low base fees (0.015% / 0.045%) plus fee-credit campaigns and a 5% referee discount
✓Gas-free trading, native USDC deposits from five chains, bridge audited by OpenZeppelin
✕Core L1 and matching engine are unaudited; validator set and team are undisclosed; no public API documentation
✕Access still requires an invite code; no token, and the points rules are unpublished

Hyperliquid vs TxFlow FAQ

Which has higher trading volume, Hyperliquid or TxFlow?
Hyperliquid — about $2.52B in the last 24 hours versus $131.7M on TxFlow. Figures are a dated snapshot (Oct 10, 2026) and move constantly.
Is Hyperliquid or TxFlow cheaper to trade?
Both list the same headline taker fee of 0.045%. Your real cost also depends on network gas, maker rebates and price impact on the size you trade.
Which offers higher leverage, Hyperliquid or TxFlow?
TxFlow allows up to 75×, versus 40× on Hyperliquid. Higher leverage multiplies losses as fast as gains — it is information, not an advantage.
What's the main difference between Hyperliquid and TxFlow?
Hyperliquid is a perp dex on Hyperliquid L1, while TxFlow is a perp + spot (app-chain) on TxFlow L1. Match the venue to the chain and assets you actually use.
Understand the concepts
What are perpetuals & perp DEXes?Leverage risk & liquidationFunding rates: the hidden cost of holding a perpperpetualleveragefunding rate
More comparisons
Hyperliquid vs ApeX ProtocolHyperliquid vs AsterHyperliquid vs dYdXHyperliquid vs GMXHyperliquid vs JupiterHyperliquid vs Lighter